Incomplete Information
In competitive environments, we operate
with incomplete information as a matter of course. No battle in history would ever
have been fought if people had good information about their relative
strengths. Both sides would know before the battle who would win. Battles are
fought only because both sides think they can win. Someone is wrong.
At the most, only one side can be right. Both sides are often wrong when we
consider the cost and value of many battles.
But no one knows who will win in
competition. The information any group has is an insignificant portion of the
total information in the environment. Getting all the information you need to
bake a cake in a controlled environment is relatively easy. Getting all the
information you need to sell cakes in the competitive market is much more
difficult. There are always too many variables. There are always too many
unknowns. Who can know how many people will decide they want to buy a cake
today? Many who buy cakes in the afternoon didn't even have that information
themselves in the morning.
Competitive environments are also filled with misinformation.
Competitors try to mislead each other regarding not only their future plans but
their current circumstances. Individuals distort the truth for a variety of
reasons. As in a game of poker, any advantage you have is linked to what you
know that the other players don't know.
The limitations of information affect a buyer as well as a seller. Internal
resources are resources about which we have good information. We do not have
good information about external resources, that is, the resources that others
have. This makes finding the best product,
the lowest-cost supplier, or a reliable service provider a challenge. The volume of unknown information in the
external market is always much more than the known information available to any
single decision-maker.
Our only guide to the future
in competitive environments is the past. And while there is some continuity
with the past, our information is constantly outdated. While some aspects of the
past will continue, other aspects will change. Using planning to decide future actions
in these environments is like driving a car forward when you can only see out
the rear window. As long as the road runs straight, this can work, but when the
road turns, as it always eventually does, it is disastrous.
In controlled environments, everyone is relatively well informed about what is
changing. In larger, more complex, competitive environments, it is infinitely
more difficult to keep up with increasingly fast-changing information.
The past does not predict the future in
competitive environments. Neither does planning. Conditions are fluid. New alternatives
are constantly being offered. Everyone is continuously reacting to the changes
around them, creating dynamic situations. Everyone predicts success, but actual
results are unpredictable. When people are successful, they think their planning
worked. When they fail, they blame their plans. Most fail to see the effects of
strategy because they don't understand the differences between strategy and
planning.